Skip to content

refactor(linter): improve eslint/no-constant-condition#8845

Closed
shulaoda wants to merge 1 commit intooxc-project:mainfrom
shulaoda:refactor/no-constant-condition
Closed

refactor(linter): improve eslint/no-constant-condition#8845
shulaoda wants to merge 1 commit intooxc-project:mainfrom
shulaoda:refactor/no-constant-condition

Conversation

@shulaoda
Copy link
Contributor

@shulaoda shulaoda commented Feb 3, 2025

I've re-ported all the test cases for eslint/no-constant-condition and ensured they pass successfully. Additionally, I have aligned its options configuration with eslint.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Feb 3, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Feb 3, 2025
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 3, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8845 will not alter performance

Comparing shulaoda:refactor/no-constant-condition (1d7e4f3) with main (36007de)

Summary

✅ 33 untouched benchmarks

@Boshen Boshen requested a review from Sysix February 3, 2025 04:10
@shulaoda shulaoda marked this pull request as draft February 3, 2025 04:15
@shulaoda shulaoda marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 15:08
Copy link
Member

@Sysix Sysix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks you.

Copy link
Member

@Boshen Boshen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you do a fix PR for the global reference problem (semantic + globals) to reduce the changes of this PR?

Sysix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
Can you do a fix PR for the global reference problem (semantic +
`globals`) to reduce the changes of this PR?

_Originally posted by @Boshen in
#8845 (review)
@shulaoda shulaoda force-pushed the refactor/no-constant-condition branch from 32d78c0 to 1d7e4f3 Compare February 7, 2025 16:15
@Sysix Sysix requested a review from Boshen February 8, 2025 19:49
@Boshen Boshen marked this pull request as draft February 12, 2025 04:04
@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

camc314 commented May 27, 2025

closed by #10949

@camc314 camc314 closed this May 27, 2025
@shulaoda shulaoda deleted the refactor/no-constant-condition branch May 27, 2025 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants